Beckman v. Aramark

Plaintiff: M.G. Beckman
Defendant: Aramark
Case Number: 0:2013cv00052
Filed: April 18, 2013
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: Ashland Office
County: Rowan
Referring Judge: PSO
Presiding Judge: Henry R. Wilhoit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 26, 2014 83 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motionfor Summary Judgment DE 70 be SUSTAINED. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 6/26/14.(KSS)cc: COR, Beckman (via US Mail)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beckman v. Aramark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: M.G. Beckman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark
Represented By: Laura Leigh Mays
Represented By: John L. Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.