Adkins v. Advocat, Inc. et al
Defendant: Advocat, Inc., Diversicare Healthcare Services, Inc.,, Diversicare Leasing Corp., Diversicare Management Services, Co., Nate Carder and John Does 1 through 5
Case Number: 0:2014cv00152
Filed: October 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Ashland Office
County: Greenup
Presiding Judge: Henry R. Wilhoit
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider DE 21 be OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 9/2/15.(KSS)cc: COR
April 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Dft's Motion to Enforce Arbitration Agreement DE 3 be SUSTAINED AND Plf's Motion to Amend and Remand (Docket No. 10) 9 be OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plf shall prosecute all of his claims arising out of Adkins' residency at Wurtland Nursing & Rehab Center in accordance with the terms of the Arbitration Agreement and that this matter is hereby STAYED pending any further proceedings to enforce any award of the arbitrator. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 4/17/15.(KSS)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adkins v. Advocat, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advocat, Inc.
Represented By: Michael F. Sutton
Represented By: Sarah E. Tilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diversicare Healthcare Services, Inc.,
Represented By: Michael F. Sutton
Represented By: Sarah E. Tilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diversicare Leasing Corp.
Represented By: Michael F. Sutton
Represented By: Sarah E. Tilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diversicare Management Services, Co.
Represented By: Michael F. Sutton
Represented By: Sarah E. Tilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nate Carder
Represented By: Michael F. Sutton
Represented By: Sarah E. Tilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1 through 5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?