Martinez-Aguilar v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
Rafael Martinez-Aguilar |
Commonwealth of Kentucky |
3:2014cv00055 |
July 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Frankfort Office |
Franklin |
Hanly A. Ingram |
Amul R. Thapar |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER:(1) Magistrate Judge Ingram's Recommended Disposition, R. 3 , is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. (2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus, R. 1 , is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Amul R. Thapar on 10/14/2014.(AKR)cc: papercopy to petitioner via US Mail |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Martinez-Aguilar v. Commonwealth of Kentucky | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Commonwealth of Kentucky | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Rafael Martinez-Aguilar | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.