MLCFC 2007-8 Fayette SG Property, LLC v. Meadowood Apartments of Lexington, Ltd. et al
MLCFC 2007-8 Fayette SG Property, LLC |
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Longwood Apartments of Lexington, Ltd, Meadowood Apartments of Lexington, Ltd., Cedarwood Apartments of Lexington II, Ltd, Cedarwood Apartments of Lexington, III, Ltd and PW Real Estate Investments Inc. |
5:2012cv00319 |
October 12, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Lexington Office |
Fayette |
Danny C. Reeves |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2) Pla will be awarded judgment against dfts in the amt of $10,857,338.17, plus per diem interest of $2,190.213 accuring from 5/8/2013 until the principal amt i s paid in full. 3) The mechanics of the pla's foreclosure against the real property securing the dfts' indebtedness shall be set out in a corresponding Order of Sale to be entered separately. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 10/15/2013.(SCD)cc: COR |
Filing 54 MEMORANDUM ORDER: An entry fo default has not been entered by the Clerk of the Court in this matter. Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff's 52 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on September 5, 2013. (MWZ)cc: COR |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.