Pardassee v. Federal Medical Center, Lexington
Plaintiff: Bharrat Steven Pardassee
Defendant: Federal Medical Center, Lexington
Case Number: 5:2014cv00145
Filed: April 14, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Lexington Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: PSO
Presiding Judge: Joseph M. Hood
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Plaintiff's request for relief under FRCP 56(d) [DE 29] is DENIED; (2) Defendant's 26 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim or MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 7/23/2015.(STC)cc: COR,Plt
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pardassee v. Federal Medical Center, Lexington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bharrat Steven Pardassee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Medical Center, Lexington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?