McGrath v. Holland et al

Petitioner: Mark Edward McGrath
Respondent: Chris Holland
Case Number: 6:2013cv00070
Filed: April 2, 2013
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: London Office
County: McCreary
Referring Judge: PSO
Presiding Judge: David L. Bunning
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 12, 2013 9 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Clerk substitute Shannon Withers as the Respondent in this proceeding in place of "Chris Holland;" 2) 28:2241 filed by Mark Edward McGrath 1 is DENIED; 3) McGrath's motion seeking emergency hearing 2 is DENIED as MOOT; 4) Court will enter jgm; 5) Habeas proceeding is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 06/12/2013.(MRS)cc: COR, Pro Se Filer

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McGrath v. Holland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Edward McGrath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Chris Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.