Eagle v. SSA

Plaintiff: Angela Marie Eagle
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Case Number: 6:2014cv00010
Filed: January 13, 2014
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: London Office
County: Harlan
Presiding Judge: Joseph M. Hood
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 20, 2014 17 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [D.E. 15 ] be, and the same hereby is, DENIED; and (2) that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [D.E. 16 ] be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. Signed by Judge Joseph M. Hood on 11/20/2014.(KJA)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eagle v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Marie Eagle
Represented By: Ronald C. Cox(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Represented By: John S. Osborn, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.