United States of America v. Kortz

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Mary A. Kortz
Case Number: 3:2010cv00072
Filed: February 4, 2010
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Louisville Office
County: Oldham
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Simpson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery Student Loan
Cause of Action: 20:1080 Student Loan Recovery
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 9, 2011 7 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 8/8/2011; re 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment against Mary Angela Kortz; a separate order will issue in accordance with this opinion.cc:counsel (TLB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Kortz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Elizabeth H. Parks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary A. Kortz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.