Lite Source, Inc. v. International Lighting Corp.
||Lite Source, Inc.
||International Lighting Corp.
||October 19, 2012
||Kentucky Western District Court
||James D. Moyer
||Joseph H. McKinley
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||17:501 Copyright Infringement
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 7, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 23 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 3/7/13. cc:counsel (JBM)
|December 3, 2013
OPINION by Magistrate Judge James D. Moyer on 12/3/13. Currently pending before the court are several discovery motions docket nos. 38 , 41 , 42 , 57 and 68 and one discovery dispute briefed in correspondence with the court. In an accompanying order, and for the reasons explained further in this Opinion, the court will deny the plaintiffs motion for leave to propound a second set of interrogatories and request for production of documents (dn. 68 ), as well as all other pending motions fil ed by the plaintiff (dn. 41 , 42 , and 57 ). The court will also deny defendants motion for leave to extend time to respond to discovery requests (dn. 38 ) as moot, but will grant its request that plaintiff promptly supplement its discovery responses to the requests described in defendants letter dated 9/26/13. The court will enter a separate order regarding the rulings made in this opinion. cc:counsel (DJT)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.