Slappy v. Fizzell et al
Plaintiff: Willie Coleman Slappy
Defendant: Chad Fizzell, Amy Roell, Jeff Rodgers and Hickman County Detention Center
Case Number: 5:2014cv00185
Filed: October 1, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Paducah Office
County: Hickman
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 6/23/2016; Upon review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Orders shows a failure to pursue his case. Therefore, by separate Order, the Court will dismiss the instant action. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel (CDR)
July 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Dismiss; granting 16 Motion to Compel; Discovery due by 9/25/2015., Dispositive Motions due by 11/26/2015., Plaintiff's Pre-trial Memorandum due by 10/22/2015. Defendants' Pre-trial Memorandum due by 11/26/2015.. Signed by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 7/2/2015. cc: Counsel(KJA)
January 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims against the HCDC, Defendants in their official capacities, Defendant Frizzell, and Defendant Roell for her fai lure to provide free photocopies are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate the Hickman County Detention Center and Defendant Frizzell as Defendants in this action. A separate Scheduling Order will govern the development of the continuing claims, i.e., the individual-capacity Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Roell and Rodgers. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Hickman County Atty (SG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Slappy v. Fizzell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie Coleman Slappy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chad Fizzell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amy Roell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff Rodgers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hickman County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?