Bd of Supv of LSU, et al v. Smack Apparel Co, et al
| Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, Ohio State University and University of Southern California |
| Smack Apparel Company, Wayne Curtiss and Edward H Bergin |
| Smack Apparel Company and Wayne Curtiss |
| Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, Ohio State University, University of Southern California, Pasadena Tournament of Roses and Collegiate Licensing Company |
| 2:2004cv01593 |
| June 7, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| East Baton Rouge |
| Mary Ann Vial Lemmon |
| Joseph C. Wilkinson |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
346
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 343 : ORDERED that the Renewed 312 Motion for Civil Contempt, Sanctions,Attorneys Fees and Costs filed by plaintiffs is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon.(ijg, )
|
|
Filing
343
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re atty fees and costs. Objections to R&R due by 3/13/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr.(car, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
