In Re: Beechgrove Redevelopment Phase II, L.L.C.

Plaintiff: Beechgrove Redevelopment Phase II, L.L.C.
Defendant: Lori Wilson
Case Number: 2:2009cv04347
Filed: July 8, 2009
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Jefferson
Referring Judge: Alma L. Chasez
Presiding Judge: A. J. McNamara
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 10, 2009 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER AND REASONS granting 1 Motion to Withdraw Reference and 3 Motion for Abstention. Signed by Judge A. J. McNamara on 9/10/2009. (caa, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Beechgrove Redevelopment Phase II, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beechgrove Redevelopment Phase II, L.L.C.
Represented By: Jan Marie Hayden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lori Wilson
Represented By: Louis L. Gertler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.