United States of America v. McDoneld

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Kevin A. McDoneld
Case Number: 2:2011cv01313
Filed: June 2, 2011
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Office: New Orleans Office
County: St John the Baptist
Presiding Judge: Lance M Africk
Referring Judge: Sally Shushan
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26:7402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 21, 2011 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 , that the 1 Petition to Enforce IRS Summons is granted; Kevin McDonald is ordered to comply with summons. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 10/20/2011.(lag, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. McDoneld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Andre Jude Lagarde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin A. McDoneld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.