New Orleans Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma sought an order of specific performance to compel NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell to comply with the terms of the NFL-National Football League Players Association Collective Bargaining Agreement and issue a decision on Vilma's appeal of Goodell's prior disciplinary decision in a manner and according to the timeframe mandated by the NFL-NFLPA CBA. This suit is related to Goodell's suspension of Vilma without pay for the entire 2012 regulator season because of Vilma's alleged participation in a bounty program that provided monetary incentives for injuring specific opposing players.
Jonathan Vilma |
National Football League |
2:2012cv01718 |
June 30, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Out of State |
Helen G. Berrigan |
Daniel E. Knowles |
Labor/Management Relations |
29 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
None |
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Susie Morgan and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cl, ) |
Filing 2 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Peter R. Ginsberg (Fee previously paid) by Jonathan Vilma. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Proposed Order)(Williams, Conrad) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Football League (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 053L-3575026) filed by Jonathan Vilma. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons)(Ginsberg, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.