Dasilva v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Rafael Ellwanger Dasilva |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Glenda M. Raborn, Joseph La Rocca and Cindy Gomez |
| 2:2013cv00013 |
| January 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Tangipahoa |
| Lance M Africk |
| Daniel E. Knowles |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 83 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 5/7/2014. (blg)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER & REASONS that objection to ex parte communications is overruled; FURTHER ORDERED that 85 MOTION for Leave to File Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees is granted; FURTHER ORDERED that 83 Second MOTION for Attorney Fees will be taken under advisement without oral argument on 4/3/2014 09:00 AM. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 3/27/2014.(lag)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER AND REASONS granting in part, denying in part, and dismissing without prejudice in all other respects 70 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs. FURTHER ORDERED that on or before 3/10/2014, plaintiff shall file a separate motion, including a revised time sheet consistent with the directives herein, addressing the proper amount of attorney's fees relative solely to the disclosure of the second set of documents. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 2/24/2014. (blg)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER AND REASONS denying 73 MOTION for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act filed by Rafael Ellwanger Dasilva. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 2/3/2014.(blg)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER AND REASONS that USCIS's 41 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and that DaSilva's 39 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 9/19/2013.(blg)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER AND REASONS re 39 and 41 Motions for Summary Judgment: ORDERED that the motions for summary judgment are DISMISSED AS MOOT relative to the documents referred to ICE. FURTHER ORDERED that USCIS's motion for summary judgment is GRANTE D IN PART and DaSilva's motion for summary judgment is DENIED IN PART. FURTHER ORDERED that the Court DEFERS ruling on the cross motions pending in camera review of documents, as stated herein. USCIS shall provide the Court with an unredact ed copy of these documents no later than Monday, 9/16/2013. FURTHER ORDERED that the Court DEFERS ruling on documents, as stated herein, pending the submission of a supplemental affidavit. USCIS shall submit a supplementary affidavit relative to these documents on or before Monday, 9/16/2013. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 9/4/2013. (blg)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDERED that the 27 motion for partial summary judgment and the 31 motion for judicial notice are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit cross motions for summary judgment on or before 5/1/2013. To the exte nt the parties intend the Court to consider assertions or arguments made in other pleadings, including prior motions or oppositions, the parties should present these assertions or arguments in the May 1 motions. FURTHER ORDERED that these motions shall be taken under advisement on 5/15/2013, without oral argument. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 4/19/2013. (blg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
