In the Matter of the Complaint of B&R Towing, Inc., As Owner and/or Operator of the M/V Miss Kim in a Cause of Action for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability

Claimant: Hoythe Savoie
Petitioner: B&R Towing Inc
Case Number: 2:2013cv00557
Filed: March 26, 2013
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Ascension
Presiding Judge: Nannette Jolivette Brown
Referring Judge: Joseph C. Wilkinson
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 46:30504 Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In the Matter of the Complaint of B&R Towing, Inc., As Owner and/or Operator of the M/V Miss Kim in a Cause of Action for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Hoythe Savoie
Represented By: Louis Roy Koerner, Jr.
Represented By: Robert Brent Cueria
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: B&R Towing Inc
Represented By: John Gregory Murphy
Represented By: Michael G. Helm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.