Ioppolo v. Rumana et al
| 3:2006cv00193 |
| March 10, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Docia L Dalby |
| Ralph E. Tyson |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
RULING: Ioppolo's 176 Motion for a New Trial or, in the Alternative, Motion to Amend the Interlocutory Order is DENIED. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 1/3/2013. (JDL)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 164 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 166 Motion for Partial Dismissal. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 10/16/2012. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
135
RULING denying 131 Motion for Reconsideration of 130 Order on Motion to Dismiss. This matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings involving the remaining Defendants Rumana and Cuffe. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 11/3/2011. (JDL)
|
|
Filing
130
RULING on 111 Motion to Dismiss and 9 Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 8/12/2011. (LSM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ioppolo v. Rumana et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
