Amedysis Western, L.L.C. v. Bartel
| Amedisys Western, L.L.C., LA |
| Christine Bartel, CO |
| 3:2014cv00658 |
| October 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Shelly D. Dick |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
RULING granting in part and denying in part 42 PRO SE Motion. The Court accepts Defendant's motion as a response in compliance with the Court's Order advising that Defendant is currently proceeding pro se. However, to the extent that t he Defendant's motion may be interpreted as a request that the Court appoint counsel on her behalf, that motion is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant's right to file an appropriate motion for such relief in accordance with the Local Rules of Court and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 11/19/2015. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
40
RULING granting 37 Motion to Review Order denying 35 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, and Gold Weems' Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 10/2/2015. (LLH) Modified on 10/2/2015 to edit text (LLH).
|
|
Filing
24
RULING Adopting the 17 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 4 Motion to Dismiss or Motion to Transfer Case filed by Defendant, Christine Bartel is DENIED. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 4/27/2015. (LLH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
