Edwards et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
Arthur Edwards and Hilda Edwards |
Ashley Edwards, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Edward McAlpine, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Wal-Mart Transportation, L.L.C. |
3:2015cv00019 |
January 16, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Shelly D. Dick |
Stephen C. Riedlinger |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 RULING granting 9 Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, is dismissed from these proceedings without prejudice. Any response to this Ruling, based on the appropriate Federal Rule of Civil Proce dure, shall be filed within fourteen (14) days and must be accompanied by an opposition memorandum to the original Motion. A statement of costs conforming to L.R. 54(c) shall be submitted by all parties desiring to be awarded costs and attorney's fees no later than seven (7) days prior to the hearing on the newly filed motion. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 6/1/2015. (LLH) |
Filing 23 RULING Adopting the 21 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 8 Motion to Remand filed by the plaintiffs, Hilda and Arthur Edwards, is DENIED. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 5/15/2015. (LLH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.