McLean et al v. Big Dog Group LLC et al
| James Spencer McLean and Mary Madeline Hebert McLean |
| Big Dog Group LLC, C. M. Field, TD Auto Finance and Ronald Todd Zeigler |
| 3:2015cv00040 |
| January 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| John W. deGravelles |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
RULING AND ORDER: The 69 Motion to Set Aside Preliminary Default of Defendant, Big Dog Group, L.L.C. a/k/a AutoYes is GRANTED; and the Clerk's office is hereby directed to vacate and set aside the entry of default entered against AutoYes. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 4/14/2016. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
54
RULING: The 45 Motion to Compel Answer of Defendant filed by the James Spencer McLean and Mary Madeline Hebert McLean is denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 10/14/2015. (BCL)
|
|
Filing
49
RULING granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to File Amended Complaint. The clerk of court will file the Plaintiffs' Proposed Amended Complaint, which shall be considered as their first amended complaint. The motion is denied only i nsofar as the plaintiffs sought to amend the caption of the case. The 41 Motion to Amend Exhibits is granted. The clerk of court will add the exhibits submitted with the motion to the exhibits filed with Plaintiffs' Proposed Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs' 44 Motion to Strike Defendant Ronald Todd Zeiglers Defendant 42 Response is granted. The clerk of court will strike the Defendant Response filed 5/28/2015. Defendant Zeigler shall have 21 days to file an answer - titled as such - to the Plaintiffs' Proposed Amended Complaint, which answer must conform to the requirements of Rule 8, Fed.R.Civ.P.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 9/8/2015. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER AND REASONS denying 6 Motion or Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Arbitration without prejudice to the right of Autoyes to re-urge the motion after conducting discovery on whether Plaintiffs and Autoyes formed a valid agreement to arbitrate. Signed by Judge John W. deGravelles on 4/14/2015. (SMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
