Ouber v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Hazel D. Ouber |
Jason Ard and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association |
3:2015cv00100 |
February 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Shelly D. Dick |
Richard L. Bourgeois |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 RULING: Local rule 7(f) of the Middle District of Louisiana requires that memoranda in opposition to a motion be filed within twenty-one (21) days after service of the motion. As of 9/25/2015, no memorandum in opposition has been submitted, and no re quests for extensions of time have been made. Therefore the 10 FRCP 12(B)(6) MOTION to Dismiss filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association is GRANTED and all claims asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant JPMorgan Chase, N.A. are dis missed from these proceedings without prejudice. The claims against Defendant Jason Ard remain in the Court. Any response to this Ruling, based on the appropriate Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, shall be filed within fourteen (14) days and must be accompanied by an opposition memorandum to the original Motion. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 9/25/2015. (LLH) Modified on 9/25/2015 to edit text (LLH). |
Filing 20 RULING Adopting the 19 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and the Plaintiff's 14 Motion to Remand is denied. Signed by Judge Shelly D. Dick on 8/28/2015. (JDL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.