Peters v. Astrue
| Lisa Marie Peters |
| Michael J Astrue |
| 2:2012cv02821 |
| October 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lake Charles Office |
| Calcasieu |
| Kathleen Kay |
| Patricia Minaldi |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING 22 Report and Recommendations; IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's 19 Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED and that the plaintiff be awarded fees and costs of $5,717.25 under the Equal Justice Act. Signed by Judge Patricia Minaldi on 12/7/2015. (crt,FinnSld, P)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER re: 1 Complaint filed by Lisa Marie Peters; IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision be REVERSED and VACATED and the matter REMANDED for a new hearing pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 USC 405(g) for another hearing; IT IS FUR THER ORDERED that upon remand, the ALJ is instructed to comply with HALLEX I-2-7-3- and HALLEX I-2-7-35B and proffer any post-hearing evidence, including the consultative examination report from Dr. R. Dale Bernauer, to plaintiff and/or plaintiff 9;s attorney. The ALJ is further instructed to update the treatment evidence on plaintiff's medical condition, further evaluate plaintiff's impairments and residual functional capacity, and obtain additional vocational expert testimony if necessary. Signed by Judge Patricia Minaldi on 10/7/2014. (crt,FinnSld, P)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM RULING re 13 MOTION to Remand filed by Michael J Astrue. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision should be REVERSED and VACATED and the matter REMANDED for a new hearing pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for another hearing. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that upon remand, the ALJ is instructed to comply with HALLEX I-2-7-30 and HALLAX I-2-7-35B and proffer any post-hearing evidence, including the consultative examination report from Dr. R. Dale Bernauer, to plaintiff and/or plaintiffs attorney. The ALJ is further instructed to update the treatment evidence on plaintiffs medical condition, further evaluate plaintiffs impairments and residual functional capacity, and obtain additional vocational expert testimony if necessary. The effect of this ruling is suspended for fourteen (14) days to allow either party to seek review from the district court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay on June 11, 2014. (crt,Benoit, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Peters v. Astrue | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lisa Marie Peters | |
| Represented By: | James Spruel, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael J Astrue | |
| Represented By: | Katherine W Vincent |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
