Heylock v. Clairgray
Plaintiff: Jorge Alfredo Colomer Heylock
Defendant: Yvette Clairgray
Case Number: 2:2015cv00660
Filed: March 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Lake Charles Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Kathleen Kay
Presiding Judge: Patricia Minaldi
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendations, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 Complaint filed by Jorge Alfredo Colomer Heylock, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the court lacks jurisdiction to consider these claims. Signed by Judge Patricia Minaldi on 12/15/2015. (crt,FinnSld, P)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heylock v. Clairgray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jorge Alfredo Colomer Heylock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yvette Clairgray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?