Wright v. LeBlanc et al
| Randy Wright |
| James M LeBlanc, Wydette Williams, Johnny Hedgeman, Lester Martin and Calvin Barnes |
| 3:2014cv03130 |
| October 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Monroe Office |
| East Carroll |
| Karen L Hayes |
| Robert G James |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 18 Report and Recommendation re 4 Complaint filed by Randy Wright. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's civil rights Complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may move for reinstatement within 30 days of this order by showing good cause for his violation of Local Rule 41.3 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by Judge Robert G James on 6/17/15. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
|
|
Filing
14
JUDGMENT adopting in part 8 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. ORDER granting 10 Motion to Amend Complaint. ORDER denying 12 Motion to Appoint Counsel. ORDER Dismissing with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to st ate a claim, Plaintiff's claims, EXCEPT his excessive force claim. ORDER denying 11 Motion for Request for Production of Documents. ORDER REMANDING case to the Magistrate Judge for further consideration of Plaintiff's remaining excessive force claim. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 3/19/15. (crt,Crawford, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
