Harris v. City of Bastrop et al
Brysan Harris |
City of Bastrop, Police Dept City of Bastrop, Dennis Keith Aswell, Steven R Rawls and X Y Z Insurance Co |
3:2015cv00761 |
March 24, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Monroe Office |
Morehouse |
Karen L Hayes |
Robert G James |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling 19 , IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to amend, contained in his memorandum in opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 14] is GRANTED. Plaintiff has 14 day s from the date of this Judgment to file an amended Complaint asserting a false arrest claim. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 11] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent Defe ndants move for summary judgment on Plaintiffs 42 U.S.C. § 1983 municipal liability claims, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 conspiracy claim, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claim under Louisiana law, their motion is GRANTED, and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants motion is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff has ten days from the date of this Ruling to file an opposition memorandum to the Courts sua sponte notice of intent to dismiss his claims against the Bastrop Police Department. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 7/19/16. (crt,DickersonSld, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.