Houston Specialty Insurance Co v. Chesapeake Operating L L C et al
Houston Specialty Insurance Co |
Chesapeake Operating L L C, J C Fodale Energy Services L L C and D C W Transport L L C |
5:2015cv00047 |
January 8, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Shreveport Office |
Caddo |
Elizabeth E Foote |
Mark L Hornsby |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 MEMORANDUM RULING granting in part and denying in part 55 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 57 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 59 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, with the right to re-urge the indemnity issue at the appropriate time. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 9/27/2017. (crt,Keifer, K) |
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM ORDER. Defendants are directed to promptly provide their detailed citizenship information to counsel for Plaintiff so that this preliminary issue may be resolved as quickly and efficiently as possible. Plaintiff will be allowed until May 2 7, 2015 to file an amended complaint that contains the necessary citizenship information. Any amended complaint filed after that date will require a motion for leave to amend. Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 15(a). The court will set a scheduling conference if the amended complaint establishes that there is diversity. Otherwise, the case will be subject to dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 5/11/15. (crt,Kennedy, T) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.