KIMBALL v. HOWER
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN KIMBALL
Defendant: JOHN F HOWER, JR
Case Number: 1:2012cv00076
Filed: March 6, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Bangor Office
County: Kennebec
Presiding Judge: MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK
Presiding Judge: JOHN A. WOODCOCK
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Motion is Denied as to Count 1 as it relates to HSV-2 claim, Granted as to Count 1 as it relates to HSV-1 claim, and Granted on Count 2. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (jgw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KIMBALL v. HOWER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN KIMBALL
Represented By: SUSAN R. FARNSWORTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN F HOWER, JR
Represented By: JASON M. JABAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?