FLANDERS v. MASS RESISTANCE et al
| ADAM FLANDERS |
| MASS RESISTANCE and BRIAN CAMENKER |
| 1:2012cv00262 |
| September 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Bangor Office |
| Waldo |
| MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK |
| JOHN A. WOODCOCK |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER DENYING AND DISMISSING MOTION FOR REMOVAL OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION denying in part and dismissing in part 37 Motion for Order By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
|
|
Filing
36
AMENDED ORDER affirming Report and Recommended Decision 21 ; granting 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 24 Motion to Amend and Add Defendants; denying Additional Filings 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 and 33 treated as Motions to S upplement; dismissing as moot 31 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs "Additional Findings". This Amended Order corrects typographical errors contained in the Order dated 5/21/13 (ECF No. 34). Please see footnote 1 of the Amended Order for the corrections. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER affirming Report and Recommended Decision 21 ; granting 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 24 Motion to Amend and Add Defendants ; denying Additional Filings 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 and 33 treated as Motions to Supplement; dismissing as moot 31 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs "Additional Findings" By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (jgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
