BAILEY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Plaintiff: STUART A BAILEY
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Case Number: 2:2013cv00057
Filed: February 21, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Portland Office
County: Androscoggin
Presiding Judge:
Referring Judge:
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER Affirming the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge 19 . By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BAILEY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STUART A BAILEY
Represented By: MICHAEL A. BELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?