BROWN v. MABUS
Plaintiff: WILLIAM VERNON BROWN
Defendant: RAY MABUS
Case Number: 2:2014cv00426
Filed: October 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Portland Office
County: York
Presiding Judge: JOHN H. RICH
Presiding Judge: NANCY TORRESEN
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 791
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT - granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mnw)
July 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS denying 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (rmb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROWN v. MABUS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM VERNON BROWN
Represented By: JOHN F. LAMBERT, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RAY MABUS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?