Slowik v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff: Timothy Francis Slowik
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2011cv01698
Filed: June 21, 2011
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Allegany
Presiding Judge: Catherine C. Blake
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42:427
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 21, 2012 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 16 Motion by plaintiff for Summary Judgment; granting 21 Motion by defendant for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth P. Gesner on 8/20/12. (cags, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Slowik v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Francis Slowik
Represented By: Brian Douglas Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Alex S Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.