Sowell v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Wilbert Sowell, Jr.
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2012cv03371
Filed: November 16, 2012
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Baltimore Office
County: Prince George's
Presiding Judge: William D Quarles
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 22, 2014 30 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. DiGirolamo on 9/19/2014. (rss, Deputy Clerk)
April 1, 2015 37 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. DiGirolamo on 4/1/2015. (bas, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sowell v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wilbert Sowell, Jr.
Represented By: Jonathan Steven Beiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.