Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Marcella M. Klinger, LLC
Plaintiff: Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc.
Defendant: Marcella M. Klinger, LLC
Case Number: 1:2013cv00801
Filed: March 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Baltimore Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: James K. Bredar
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 Environmental Matters
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 8 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James K. Bredar on 10/1/13. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Marcella M. Klinger, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc.
Represented By: David T Buente, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marcella M. Klinger, LLC
Represented By: Paul D Flynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?