Addison v. Dept. of the Navy

Plaintiff: Vernon Addison
Defendant: Dept. of the Navy
Case Number: 8:2013cv00846
Filed: March 20, 2013
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Deborah K. Chasanow
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 20, 2015 26 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m to Plaintiff 3/20/15 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 3/20/2015. (sat, Chambers)
April 13, 2015 29 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING 28 Motion for Reconsideration (c/m to Plaintiff 4/13/15 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 4/13/2015. (sat, Chambers)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Addison v. Dept. of the Navy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vernon Addison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dept. of the Navy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.