Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1 - 36 1:2012cv10758 | US District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1 - 36

Plaintiff:	Patrick Collins, Inc.
Defendant:	Does 1 - 36
Case Number:	1:2012cv10758
Filed:	April 28, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Suffolk
Presiding Judge:	George A. OToole
Nature of Suit:	Copyrights
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 101
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 7, 2012	Filing 43 Ch. Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. Order on Pending Motions for Ex Parte Discovery and Order to Show Cause. For the foregoing reasons, the Plaintiffs' Renewed Motions for Ex Parte Discovery (12-cv-10805-NMG, Docket # 43; 12-cv- 10532-GAO, Docket # 43; and, 12-cv-10758-GAO, Docket# 37) are DENIED. It is further ORDERED that by the close of business on November 16, 2012, the Plaintiffs shall show cause why their cases should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) for failure to effect timely service. See attached Order. (Chernetsky, James)
August 22, 2012	Filing 35 Ch. Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered regarding Motions To Quash and Sever (Docket #s 10, 11, 14, 16 17). On August 10, 2012, the Court quashed the subpoenas at issue, indicating that this memorandum would issue at a subs equent date. See Docket # 30. To the extent that the Plaintiff wishes to file renewed motions for early discovery, it shall do so as described herein by the close of business on September 10, 2012. See attached Report and Recommendations. (Chernetsky, James)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 7, 2012

Filing 43 Ch. Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. Order on Pending Motions for Ex Parte Discovery and Order to Show Cause. For the foregoing reasons, the Plaintiffs' Renewed Motions for Ex Parte Discovery (12-cv-10805-NMG, Docket # 43; 12-cv- 10532-GAO, Docket # 43; and, 12-cv-10758-GAO, Docket# 37) are DENIED. It is further ORDERED that by the close of business on November 16, 2012, the Plaintiffs shall show cause why their cases should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) for failure to effect timely service. See attached Order. (Chernetsky, James)

August 22, 2012

Filing 35 Ch. Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered regarding Motions To Quash and Sever (Docket #s 10, 11, 14, 16 17). On August 10, 2012, the Court quashed the subpoenas at issue, indicating that this memorandum would issue at a subs equent date. See Docket # 30. To the extent that the Plaintiff wishes to file renewed motions for early discovery, it shall do so as described herein by the close of business on September 10, 2012. See attached Report and Recommendations. (Chernetsky, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1 - 36
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Collins, Inc.
Represented By:	Marvin N. Cable
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 - 36
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?