Greene v. Suffolk County Sheriff Department

Justia Dockets & Filings First Circuit Massachusetts District Court Greene v. Suffolk County Sheriff Department

Greene v. Suffolk County Sheriff Department

Plaintiff:	Timothy C Greene
Defendant:	Suffolk County Sheriff Department
Case Number:	1:2012cv11685
Filed:	September 5, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Suffolk
Presiding Judge:	Douglas P. Woodlock
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 15, 2018	Filing 75 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting 62 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 66 Motion to Strike. The grant of summary judgment disposes of the last of the outstanding claims in this case . Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the defendants. The motion to strike is granted only to the extent that the sanction of $2,000 under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(1)(A) is imposed for the untimely tender of Rabbi Rosenberg's affidavit. The sanction shall be paid over directly to Plaintiff's counsel on or before July 13, 2018. (Woodlock, Douglas)
July 13, 2015	Filing 36 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Defendants are ordered to file a motion for summary judgment by September 11, 2015. Plaintiffs respon se may include an affidavit or declaration detailing any discovery necessary to respond to the motion for summary judgment, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d), but should in any event respond to defendants motion for summary judgment on the merits. (Woodlock, Douglas)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 15, 2018

Filing 75 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting 62 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 66 Motion to Strike. The grant of summary judgment disposes of the last of the outstanding claims in this case . Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the defendants. The motion to strike is granted only to the extent that the sanction of $2,000 under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(1)(A) is imposed for the untimely tender of Rabbi Rosenberg's affidavit. The sanction shall be paid over directly to Plaintiff's counsel on or before July 13, 2018. (Woodlock, Douglas)

July 13, 2015

Filing 36 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Defendants are ordered to file a motion for summary judgment by September 11, 2015. Plaintiffs respon se may include an affidavit or declaration detailing any discovery necessary to respond to the motion for summary judgment, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d), but should in any event respond to defendants motion for summary judgment on the merits. (Woodlock, Douglas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greene v. Suffolk County Sheriff Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy C Greene
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Suffolk County Sheriff Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?