Jarvis et al v. Village Vault, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc., James Jarvis, Robert Crampton and Russell Jarvis
Defendant: Village Vault, Inc. and Mary Elizabeth Heffernan
Case Number: 1:2012cv40032
Filed: March 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Worcester
Presiding Judge: Joseph L. Tauro
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 71 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER"Village Gun Shop was not coerced by the government intoviolating the Owners rights, nor does it provide a traditionalpublic function. Additionally, Village Gun Shops actions donot cons titute a connection with state action sufficient towarrant a holding that it is a state actor under the nexus orjoint function test. The Court holds that Village Gun Shop isnot a state actor for the purposes of this section 1983 action.Accordingly, t he Owners Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is24DENIED and summary judgment is GRANTED to Village Gun Shop. TheCourt has the undoubted authority to enter summary judgmentagainst the moving party pursuant to Federal Rule of CivilProcedure 56(f)(1). Judgment will enter in favor of Village GunShop at the close of the case.SO ORDERED."(Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jarvis et al v. Village Vault, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc.
Represented By: Patrick M. Groulx
Represented By: David D. Jensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Jarvis
Represented By: David D. Jensen
Represented By: Patrick M. Groulx
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Crampton
Represented By: Patrick M. Groulx
Represented By: David D. Jensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Russell Jarvis
Represented By: David D. Jensen
Represented By: Patrick M. Groulx
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Village Vault, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Elizabeth Heffernan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?