Aldrich v. Considine et al
Plaintiff: Robert Aldrich
Defendant: Kevin Curtin, Karen Considine and Christopher Muse
Case Number: 1:2013cv11405
Filed: June 6, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Douglas P. Woodlock
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pampers (Docket No. 2) is ALLOWED and the filing fee is assessed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b); Plaintiff's "Motion Requesting Pr ocedural Order to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Service of Process" (Docket No. 10) is ALLOWED only to the extent that plaintiff is permitted to proceed in forma pauperis; otherwise, the motion is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Eff ectuate Service of Process by United States Marshal and to Waive Fees/Costs (Docket No. 3) is DENIED;Plaintiff's "Motion Requesting Three Summonses and Approval to Effectuate Service of Process Through US Marshal" (Docket No. 11) is DE NIED; Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket No. 4) is DENIED; Plaintiff's "Request for hearing and Petition for Issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum to Bring Plaintiff Before the Court for Show Cause Hea ring For a Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order" (Docket No. 5) is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety; and This Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of the rulings in this Memorandum and Order would not be taken in good faith. (PSSA, 1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aldrich v. Considine et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Curtin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karen Considine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Muse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Aldrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?