Powell v. Gelb
||June 17, 2013
||Massachusetts District Court
||Nathaniel M. Gorton
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 13, 2014
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "For the foregoing reasons, 1) Respondent's motion to dismiss as time-barred (Docket No. 16 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;2) Petitioner's motions to stay (Docket No. [15 ]) and to hold habeas corpus petition in abeyance (Docket No. 21 ) remain under advisement and will be considered ripe by this Court if respondent does not file his renewed motion to dismiss on or before April 11, 2014; and 3) Petitioner's motion to appoint counsel (Docket No. 3 ) is DENIED. So ordered." (Moore, Kellyann)
|June 17, 2014
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "For the foregoing reasons, 1) respondent's Renewed Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 29 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal for reasons other than failure to file within t he AEDPA limitations period; 2) petitioner's Motion to Hold Habeas Corpus Petition in Abeyance (Docket No. 21 ) is ALLOWED and proceedings on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition are stayed pending exhaustion of his unexhausted state court claims; 3) petitioner shall renew his petition for a writ of habeas corpus no more than 30 days after exhausting his claims in state court; and 4) petitioner's Motion to Stay (Docket No. 15 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. So ordered."(Moore, Kellyann)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.