Crane Security Technologies, Inc. et al v. Rolling Optics AB
Plaintiff: Crane Security Technologies, Inc. and Visual Physics, LLC
Defendant: Rolling Optics AB
Case Number: 1:2014cv12428
Filed: June 9, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: William G. Young
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 538 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER ON POST-TRIAL MOTIONS (DOC. NOS. 491, 495, & 497) entered. For the foregoing reasons, the Court ALLOWS in part and DENIES in part RO's motion for judgment as a matter of law (Doc. No. 495) as set forth herei n; ALLOWS Crane's motion for enhanced damages but DENIES Crane's motion for attorneys' fees (Doc. No. 491); and ALLOWS in part and DENIES in part Crane's motion for injunctive relief (Doc. No. 497). The Court hereby enjoins RO fro m future infringement of Crane's patents to the extent outlined in the attached Permanent Injunction and orders RO to pay Crane enhanced damages of $326,244. The parties shall submit a proposed final judgment conforming to this Order within seven days. (due 8/30/18) (Simeone, Maria)
April 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 450 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered regarding testimony of Professor Leger.(Sorokin, Leo)
January 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 357 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered.ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. Nos. 325 & 331): Crane's Motion (Doc. No. 325) is ALLOWED, and RO's Motion (Doc. No. 331) is DENIED. Within fourteen days (2/9/2018), the partie s shall submit a joint status report stating their joint and/or separate positions on the following topics: (1) the issue(s) remaining for trial; (2)the estimated duration of the trial; (3) any further discovery necessary before trial (including reasons to permit or not to permit such discovery); and (4) whether the parties jointly request a period of time prior to preparing for trial to mediate the matter. (Montes, Mariliz)
February 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 303 Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley: ORDER entered. Order on Rolling Optics AB's Motion to Compel Production of Documents improperly withheld (# 192 ). Please see order for details. (Moore, Kellyann)
February 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 155 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION(Montes, Mariliz)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crane Security Technologies, Inc. et al v. Rolling Optics AB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crane Security Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Sydenham B. Alexander, III
Represented By: Mary R. Bonzagni
Represented By: Wayne L. Stoner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Visual Physics, LLC
Represented By: Sydenham B. Alexander, III
Represented By: Mary R. Bonzagni
Represented By: Wayne L. Stoner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rolling Optics AB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?