Kardoose v. Betancourt
Camille Kardoose |
Uziel Betancourt |
1:2014cv14188 |
November 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Essex |
F. Dennis Saylor |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered re 34 Request for notice of default filed by Camille Kardoose. Request for notice of default is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal. (Pezzarossi, Lisa) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kardoose v. Betancourt | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Camille Kardoose | |
Represented By: | Daniel A. Kazakis |
Represented By: | Daniel J. Moynihan, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Uziel Betancourt | |
Represented By: | Catherine A. Bednar |
Represented By: | Andrew J. Fay |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.