Jobs First Independent Expenditure Political Action Committee v. Coakley
| Jobs First Independent Expenditure Political Action Committee and Melissa Lucas |
| Martha J. Coakley and Brian Mannal |
| 1:2014cv14338 |
| December 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Barnstable |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 78 Motion to Strike; granting 78 Motion to Dismiss. Motion to Strike ALLOWED and Motion to Dismiss ALLOWED. This case is dismissed with prejudice. (Franklin, Yvonne)
|
|
Filing
75
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1) the motion to dismiss of defendant Brian Mannal(Docket No. 63) is, with respect to Counts III, IV and VI, DENIED, but is, with respect to Count V, ALLOWED; 2) the motion for attorneys fees and costs of defendant Brian Mannal (Docket No. 63) is DENIED and 3) the motion to dismiss of defendant Maura Healey(Docket No. 71) is ALLOWED.(Caruso, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing
18
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction (Docket No. 2) is DENIED and defendant Mannals motion to dismiss (Docket No. 11) is DENIED.(Patch, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
