Energetiq Technology, Inc. v. ASML Netherlands B.V. et al
| Energetiq Technology, Inc. |
| ASML Netherlands B.V., Excelitas Technologies Corp. and Qioptiq Photonics GmbH & Co. KG |
| 1:2015cv10240 |
| January 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Leo T. Sorokin |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER and COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER entered 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE ; 94 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all respects except as to personaljurisdiction ov er ASML BV and Qioptiq regarding LS1. As to the exception, the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE ; 107 Motion to Stay is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal if the petitions are acted upon by the Patent Office. The request for oral argument is DE NIED, as argument at this time, in the Courts judgment, is not necessary. Phase I Discovery to be completed by 9/1/2015. Joint Report due by 9/16/2015. The Court will hold a Scheduling Conference to discuss the same with the parties on September 22, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
