Easthampton Savings Bank et al v. City of Springfield
||Easthampton Savings Bank, Chicopee Savings Bank, Hampden Bank, United Bank, Monson Savings Bank and Counrty Bank for Savings
||City of Springfield
||December 16, 2011
||Massachusetts District Court
||Michael A. Ponsor
|Nature of Suit:
||Constitutionality of State Statutes
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 3, 2012
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: Forthe reasons stated in the attached memo and order, Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Dkt. No. 18 ) is hereby DENIED and DefendantsMotion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 20 ) is hereby ALLOWED. The clerk may enter judgment for Defendant. This case may now be closed. It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|July 3, 2012
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ORDER entered. JUDGMENT for defendant. (Lindsay, Maurice)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.