Mavis v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
|Defendant:||Diversified Consultants, Inc. and DOES 1-10|
|Filed:||April 29, 2013|
|Court:||Massachusetts District Court|
|Presiding Judge:||Kenneth P. Neiman|
|Nature of Suit:||Consumer Credit|
|Cause of Action:||15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act|
|Jury Demanded By:||Plaintiff|
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 11, 2014||33||Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered denying 19 Motion for Protective Order and to Dismiss. DENIED. The motion is untimely. No fees at this time. (Lindsay, Maurice)|
|April 11, 2014||34||Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered. granting 22 MOTION to Dismiss and for Sanctions. ALLOWED. The opposition offers no valid explanation or excuse for the plaintiff's failure to appear for the deposition. Not timely motion for protective order was sought. This egregiously recalcitrant conduct cannot be countenanced. This case is hereby ordered dismissed. So ordered. (Lindsay, Maurice)|
|April 11, 2014||35||Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered denying 17 Motion to Stay Summary Judgment and Trial Dates. DENIED as moot, the case having been dismissed. So ordered. (Lindsay, Maurice)|
|April 11, 2014||38||Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ORDER entered. JUDGMENT for Defendant. (Lindsay, Maurice)|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- Related Transactions
- Check Status