Hagenah v. Community Enterprises, Inc. et al
Helene E Hagenah |
Community Enterprises, Inc., Victoria Fisher and Lisa Kenney |
3:2015cv30036 |
March 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Springfield Office |
Berkshire |
Katherine A. Robertson |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER on Defendant's 19 Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Motion to Strike, and Alternative Motion for More Definitive Statement. For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: Count I is dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants; Count II is dismissed with prejudice as to defendants Fi sher and Kenney; Count III is dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants; Count V is dismissed with prejudice as to Fisher and Kenney; Count VI is dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants; and Count VII is dismissed without prejudice as to al l Defendants. Defendants' Motion is DENIED with respect to Count II as to Community Enterprises and Count IV as to all Defendants. To the extent Plaintiff desires to amend her complaint, she shall file a motion for leave to do so within forty-five (45) days of the issuance of this Memorandum and Order. See attached Memorandum and Order for complete details. (Calderon, Melissa) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.