Vamplew v. Wayne State University Board of Governors et al
Brad Vamplew |
Felicia Grace, Katherine Zimnicki, David J. Strauss, Cynthia Redwine, Mary Zugcic, Wayne State University Board of Governors and Barbara K Redman |
2:2012cv14561 |
October 15, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Wayne |
Avern Cohn |
Mark A. Randon |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 Memorandum and Order Granting Plaintiff's 95 Motion to Deny Defendants' Bill of Costs and Denying Defendants' Bill of Costs. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (SCha) |
Filing 91 Memorandum and Order Denying Plaintiff's 85 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (SCha) |
Filing 61 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 55 Motion to Compel.Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (CBet) |
Filing 50 Order Denying Non-Party Detroit Medical Center's 45 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (SCha) |
Filing 46 Order Denying 16 Motion to Quash Subpoena. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (SCha) |
Filing 42 Order Denying Plaintiff's 39 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (SCha) |
Filing 38 Memorandum and Order Granting Non-Party Detroit Medical Center's 28 Motion to Quash Subpoenas. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (SCha) |
Filing 25 Order Regarding 16 Motion to Quash Subpoena Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (SCha) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.