Hicks v. Smith
Petitioner: Carlos Hicks
Respondent: Willie Smith
Case Number: 2:2013cv11708
Filed: April 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
County: Montcalm
Presiding Judge: Laurie J. Michelson
Presiding Judge: Lawrence P. Zatkoff
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (MacKay, K)
May 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 OPINION and ORDER Construing 15 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as a Motion to Lift Stay and Denying Motion. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Carlos Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Willie Smith
Represented By: Laura Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?