Americon Group, Inc. et al v. Marco Contractors, Inc. et al
Americon Group, Inc. and Garr Electric Co., Inc. |
Marco Contractors, Inc. and Old Republic Insurance Company |
2:2014cv10785 |
February 20, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Detroit Office |
Macomb |
David M. Lawson |
Laurie J. Michelson |
Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 ORDER Denying Defendants' 96 Motion to Dismiss Claims of Plaintiff Garr Electric. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 83 ORDER (1) Withdrawing Defendants' 80 Motion to Dismiss; (2) Granting Defendants Leave to Re-File Motion to Dismiss; (3) Dismissing as Moot in Part and Denying Without Prejudice in Part Plaintiff Detroit Spectrum Painters Inc.'s 82 Mo tion to Strike Motion to Dismiss and Request for Sanctions; and (4) Continuing Proceedings on Plaintiff Detroit Spectrum Painters Inc.'s 71 Motion to Enforce Court Order and Compel Discovery and 75 Motion for Court Intervention and Sanctions. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon) |
Filing 55 OPINION and ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Third-Party Defendant's 44 MOTION to Dismiss the Third Party Complaint and Compel Arbitration. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (Monda, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.