Wright v. Winn
Petitioner: Willie Wright
Respondent: Thomas Winn
Case Number: 2:2014cv13422
Filed: September 4, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Detroit Office
County: Saginaw
Presiding Judge: Robert H. Cleland
Presiding Judge: Paul J. Komives
Nature of Suit: General
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting 17 Petitioner's Motion to Amend Petition; granting 18 Motion to Extend the Stay for 60 days. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
September 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPINION AND ORDER granting 6 Motion to Stay and Holding the Petition in Abeyance and Closing the Case for Statistical Purposes.. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Winn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Willie Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Thomas Winn
Represented By: Laura Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?